Tuesday, 27 August 2013

A Review of More4's “A Very British Witchcraft"

Earlier this month, I posted here at Albion Calling in regards to a documentary that was scheduled to be screened on British channel More4 on Saturday 17th August: "A Very British Witchcraft". As a scholar of Pagan studies with a particular research specialism in the historical development of Pagan Witchcraft in Britain, I was really excited at the prospect, as this documentary was the first time that the history of Wicca has been presented to the British public in such an accessible manner. Well, that day has been and gone, and the documentary has been screened on schedule. Thankfully, I was not disappointed. Naturally, my own perspective as a specialist in the subject would differ from that of the "average" or intended viewer, and as such I was fortunate enough to watch the subject with two family members who had no background knowledge in Wiccan history. It was interesting to observe and discuss their reactions to the film, and they subsequently suggested that, given my expertise in the subject, I put together a review of the documentary. Well, I agreed that that was a good idea, so here it is!

As a disclaimer, it is worth mentioning that I have met or otherwise communicated with pretty much everyone who appears in the film, bar a couple of exceptions. Therefore, my observations of it are not wholly objective and on a subconscious level I was no doubt influenced by my personal feelings and relationships with them. That being said, I have endeavored to provide an honest opinion, highlighting both the strengths and weaknesses of the documentary.

"A Very British Witchcraft" was presented by Professor Ronald Hutton of Bristol University, a man who is arguably the world's foremost authority on the history of Wicca, having authored The Triumph of the Moon: A History of Modern Pagan Witchcraft (1999), still the most authoritative study on the subject almost 15 years after its initial publication. Hutton is a wonderful presenter, a skill that he has no doubt honed with Ronald Hutton's Curiosities, his recent twelve-part series on obscure museums for Yesterday TV. Despite his prodigious knowledge and background in the subject, he does an excellent job at guiding the average reader through the twists and turns of the subject matter, and never assumes that they know anything about Wicca to start with. To quote just one example, one of those practicing Wiccans who appears in the documentary, John Belham-Payne, shows Hutton his collection of Gardner's memorabilia. When Belham-Payne picks up Gardner's ritual knife, or "athame", Hutton instantly asks him what exactly an athame is, knowing full well that most of his viewers will never have heard of such an item before. It is this attention to detail that is the mark of a great documentary presenter, and it is surprising just how many British television presenters just don't exhibit these same skills.

In exploring Wicca's early history, Hutton offers a brief overview of the beliefs and practices of this fascinating new religious movement, meeting with a coven in Highgate Cemetery led by Dr. Christina Oakley-Harrington, a former academic historian who is well-known in London occult circles as the proprietor of Treadwell's bookstore in Bloomsbury. Although Hutton was keen to explain that Wicca is a peaceful, nature-venerating religion quite distinct from the dark and sinister image of Satanism that it has often been mischaracterised as, one of those whom I was watching the film with expressed the feeling that the beliefs and practices were not explored in sufficient detail, a criticism with which I admittedly agree. In order to understand the faith's early history, a deeper understanding of its core tenets would have been valuable.

Hutton devotes the rest of the documentary to exploring the life of Gerald Gardner, the man widely known as the "Father of Wicca" who had founded the tradition of Gardnerian Wicca and propagated his magico-religious tradition through many initiations and the publication of several books on the subject. Hutton travels to Highcliffe in Dorset, the place where Gardner claimed to have first discovered Wicca in 1939. There, Hutton meets with Philip Heselton, an independent researcher who has authored numerous books on Gardner, including a recent two-volume biography (which I reviewed for The Pomegranate here), as well as with local historian Ian Stevenson, who remembers Gardner from his own childhood. Contributions are also provided by Geraldine Beskin and her daughter Bali Beskin, owners of Bloomsbury's Atlantis Bookshop, a place that Gardner himself used to frequent, as well as from John Belham-Payne, a founder of the Centre for Pagan Studies who was a very close friend to Gardner's most influential High Priestess, Doreen Valiente.

The documentary treats the existence of the New Forest coven as a fact of history, depicting it in much the same way that it is presented in Heselton's books. However, although I agree with Heselton that the coven most likely existed, this is not the only view. American Pagan studies scholars Aidan A. Kelly and Chas S. Clifton (the latter of whom was interviewed here back in December 2012) have argued that the New Forest coven and Operation Cone of Power were fictional inventions of Gardner's to hide the fact that he himself invented Wicca in the late 1940s/early 1950s. I don't personally agree with this argument, but I think that it should have been put forward in the documentary, even at the risk of complicating things for its viewers.

Those familiar with my own research publications will be aware that I have looked largely at those proponents of Pagan Witchcraft who were separate and distinct from Gardner and his Gardnerian tradition, such as Charles Cardell, Sybil Leek, and Robert Cochrane. Unfortunately, this documentary almost completely neglects them, in favour of focusing entirely on Gardner. The implication is that Wicca is largely the creation of Gardner, whereas a wider exploration of the subject would have highlighted that Pagan Witchcraft was, even at the beginning, a wider movement of associated different covens and individuals inspired by much the same source material.

As one might expect, I am not alone in reviewing "A Very British Witchcraft." The Daily Mail, a highly popular conservative tabloid here in the UK, offered a surprisingly glowing review here; they praised Hutton's presenting style for the "wonderful way" that he dealt with "eccentrics", believing that he radiated "a terribly English respect for them." The Mail's reviewer proceeded to praise the Wiccans who allegedly took power in Operation Cone of Power, believing them "gently heroic in their own way." More than a tad ironic considering the Mail's historic support for Nazism, Oswald Mosley, and all things fascist. Over at The Spooky Isles website, journalist Katie Doherty offered us another positive review, while the pseudonymous "Peregrin" posted an insightful critique over at the Magic of the Ordinary blog, which I would certainly recommend.

Although I am unaware of any plans to screen the film in North America or elsewhere in the world, the entire documentary has recently been uploaded to YouTube, making it easily accessible for anyone with a good internet connection to watch it. I think that its a definite must see for anyone with an interest in the history of Wicca and contemporary Paganism, whether you're an academic specialist in the subject or not. Hutton does a great job at presenting it, and there's some fascinating archive footage on show that is otherwise hard to find. It might not be perfect, but it is certainly very good, and a lot better than I feared it might have been!

Saturday, 24 August 2013

An Interview with Jimmy Elwing and Aren Roukema

Today here at Albion Calling I am interviewing two young scholars of Western esotericism, Jimmy Elwing and Aren Roukema, who are the masterminds behind the new open access peer-reviewed journal, Correspondences: An Online Journal for the Academic Study of Western Esotericism. We discuss their academic backgrounds and their role in the development of the journal, alongside their thoughts on what open access academia has to offer.

Both of you are currently engrossed in your rMA postgraduate studies at the University of Amsterdam's Center for History of Hermetic Philosophy and Related Currents, one of the world's few academic departments devoted to the study of western esotericism. What made the two of you decide to move to the Netherlands and study there; was the decision influenced by your personal backgrounds or undergraduate research?

Jimmy: When I conducted my undergraduate studies at the University of Gothenburg, I had the opportunity of having Henrik Bogdan as lecturer and supervisor, and it was largely he who made me aware of the academic study of Western esotericism. Having taken an introductory course in Western esotericism, as well as a tutorial on Renaissance esotericism, I decided to dedicate my BA thesis to the subject—and I really enjoyed doing so. When conducting my undergraduate research I realised that there is so much left to be done in the field, and when I discussed this with Henrik he recommended me to increase my knowledge of the field by applying for the MA programme at the Center for History of Hermetic Philosophy and Related Currents. I applied, got accepted, and moved to Amsterdam—and the rest is history.

Aren: For me the decision to study at the University of Amsterdam was personal. I am a Dutch citizen, but I grew up in Canada and had always wanted to live in the Netherlands. I knew about the Center but I hadn’t really planned to focus on Western esotericism, since my knowledge of the field was comprised of whatever I had gleaned from reading Umberto Eco and Dan Brown. However, I was interested in learning more so I took a course with Wouter Hanegraaff. His ideas on the importance of esoteric currents to Western history and culture were very convincing so I decided to further immerse myself.

Jimmy Elwing (left) and Aren Roukema (right)
You're both involved in the wider study of western esotericism, but my readers might be interested in learning precisely what areas of this fascinating topic you are focusing in on ? What research projects are you working on at the moment, and will any of it see publication any time soon ?

Jimmy: I have a wide array of interests within the field. In the past I have been doing research on sexuality and esotericism, more specifically on Ida Craddock and nineteenth century spiritualism, looking at issues of gender, sexuality and feminism in the study of Western esotericism. My current research is on contemporary forms of witchcraft, more specifically on what is commonly referred to—at least by some practitioners—as “traditional” or “modern traditional witchcraft.” My research into contemporary witchcraft is largely based on questions of how practitioners construct the history of their witch-cult and what strategies—political, rhetorical, polemical, etcetera—are used for legitimising ones own religious or “magical” identity and tradition. This also ties in to other, broader questions concerning theoretical discussions in the study of Western esotericism.

Aren: I am actually a Literature scholar at heart, so everything I’m working on involves the exploration of esoteric contexts in literature, usually in its English and either Victorian or early twentieth century forms. Right now I’m finishing up M.A. research on Charles Williams, and I’m also interested in Yeats and Bulwer-Lytton. Following my MA I’ll be doing PhD research on the roots of Science Fiction in modern occultism.

Considering the fact that you were undoubtedly very busy with your postgraduate research – having to ensure that essays and presentations were produced to deadline, and that all essential readings were done – what made you decide to add to your already extensive workload and create Correspondences ? How did it all begin ?

When we met in the MA programme at the University of Amsterdam, we realised that we not only shared an interest in researching Western esotericism, but that we also had common ideas and opinions on academic knowledge culture and open access publishing. Since we both have been involved with a few student magazines in the past, we also felt a need for a platform in which scholars of all levels (non-affiliated, BA, MA, PhD, Dr.) can publish their peer-reviewed research and have it read not only within academia but also by the broader public. And that’s how it all began.

For the journal you managed to assemble an impressive selection of international scholars to fill the ranks of your editorial board, among them Henrik Bogdan, Amy Hale, and Boaz Huss. Were they all on board from the very beginning, or was it a long, difficult process to get them all to sign up?

We are very happy to have such excellent scholars on our editorial board. Most of them joined up at the beginning as there was a real enthusiasm for an open access journal in the field. Peter Forshaw and Egil Asprem deserve special credit for their levels of enthusiasm and encouragement about the idea and were very helpful in getting everything set up.

Why did you choose the title of Correspondences ? Was it a clear choice or were you also keen on any other potential titles ?

We came up with a few ideas but Correspondences was always the pretty clear favourite. It definitely won out over Stuff my Prof Says and We’re Doing This Cause the Aliens Told Us To. We just liked the double entendre—the name captures our focus on creating an open forum for discussion surrounding issues related to the field of Western esotericism, and of course the doctrine of correspondences between above and below is an important aspect of many “esoteric” philosophies.

Correspondences is part of a wider trend toward the creation of free-to-read, online peer reviewed journals not under the control of big profit-making publishing houses. As part of this, the contributors get to keep the copyright to their own work, rather than sacrifice it to the publishing company, who can then sell it for whatever price they choose. I for one think that this is a really great step for the diversification of academia, threatening established publishing hegemonies and putting some of the power back into the hands of hard-working academics. Were you both supporters of this wider movement prior to Correspondences, and what effect do you think it could have in the academic world ?

We have both been supporters of the potential of web-based communication for addressing limitations created by particular power structures in, for example, the music industry or the journalism industry. However, these are examples of areas of society where attempts to rejig existing power structures to allow more control by artists or news providers, and greater, more diverse access for consumers, seem to be running a little ragged. We hope that in academia the situation will be somewhat different, but with the ever growing sway of the neo-liberal university it isn’t hard to see a lot of challenges ahead. Open access publishing successfully circumvents the limitations placed on both the speed of publication and the personal control of research, but like other “industries” that have gone before it, the knowledge economy has a lot of other power structures within that will continue to prefer older publishing models, and that have little to do with who is actually behind the publication of journals. Journal ranking systems, for example, are very important to scholars of all levels who need to advance in their careers. It takes a brave scholar indeed to ignore the opportunity to publish in a high ranking journal (most of which are still produced by publishing companies) and publish in a lower ranked open access journal instead.

Shortly after the first issue of Correspondences went public, the two of you headed up to Gothenburg, Sweden for the Fourth European Society for the Study of Western Esotericism (ESSWE) conference. What was the reception to Correspondences that you encountered both at ESSWE like, and does it differ from the reception that you have received more generally ? Are you pleased with that response, and is there anything you intend to change as a result ?

The reception has been excellent. We wouldn’t say there has been any difference between the enthusiastic response we’ve received generally and what we heard at the conference. It was great to have the opportunity to make it to Gothenburg and join in such a large forum of discussion on a wide variety of topics and issues related to Western Esotericism. Many of the authors featured in the first issue and almost all of the Editorial Board members were there as well, so we got to swap a lot of ideas for future issues.

What is in store for the future of Correspondences ? Have you already begun thinking about issue 1(2) ? Do you see it as something that you will continue editing indefinitely, or do you think that it will have a more limited lifespan, like the Journal for the Academic Study of Magic that the late Dave Evans and Alison Butler ran from 2002 to 2010 ?

We have a lot of plans for the future, but we do not want to say too much before they are finalised. Currently we are working on the next issue of Correspondences and we have received some really interesting articles that we hope will make it to the winter issue. As for our future as editors—that rumour about our divinatory powers turned out to be unsubstantiated. However, in our “best laid plans” we both plan to work with it for a long time and are also currently looking into the possibility of hiring a Review Editor.

I'm an outsider to the field, but it seems to me that the academic study of Western esotericism seems to be blossoming at the moment. Not only do you have peer-reviewed outlets like Aries and Correspondences up and running, but big, established companies like Oxford University Press are beginning to release increasing numbers of texts on occult topics like Satanism and Aleister Crowley, and both the University of Amsterdam and University of Exeter have departments that actually offer postgraduate courses on the subject. This being the case, I'd be interested to hear where you thought that the field was headed over the coming decades ? Do you see it as constantly growing in size and influence, or do you think it has just about peaked at its maximum capacity ? Considering the recent austerity spending cuts that have hit western universities, do you think it possible that the field might even decline as social science and humanities funding is directed to the hard sciences ? 

It’s hard to predict, of course. If we had to guess, we’d say that even if the field of Western esotericism doesn’t continue to grow, the amount of research being done in other fields will. We believe that the research that has been done in the last few decades will promote renewed interest in esoteric ideas, movements, and figures in fields such as literature, history, religious studies, history of science, etcetera. The theoretical work which has attempted to highlight the importance to Western history and culture of figures, movements, and ideas that have previously been rejected as esoteric will be, and has already been, particularly influential, as this gives scholars a better framework with which to approach esoteric material. Look at the field of Literature for example. Scholars have been attempting to tackle the relationship of writers such as Blake and Yeats to esotericism for decades—centuries in Blake’s case. However, with some of the new models that have been developed in order to identify what esotericism is and how it should be approached in academic research, Literature scholars can look at these two figures in a clearer light.

Jimmy and Aren, thank you for talking with Albion Calling! I look forward to the next issue of Correspondences!

Tuesday, 13 August 2013

In Memoriam: Dr. Dave Evans

It is with a heavy heart that I must publicly announce the passing of Dr. Dave Evans, a brilliant scholar of western esotericism who made a substantial contribution to the field by documenting the various twists and turns of the British occult milieu since 1947. A practising magician as well as a historian, Dave was the author of both Aleister Crowley and the 20th Century Synthesis of Magic (2001) and The History of British Magick After Crowley (2007), works based on his doctoral thesis undertaken at Bristol University under Ronald Hutton.

He was also the co-editor of Ten Years of Triumph of the Moon (2009), and editor of The Enduring Problems with Prophecy (2012), publishing articles and papers in a wide range of different sources, both academic and popular. Furthermore, he was the mastermind behind the Academic Study of Magic list-serve, and with Alison Butler was responsible for creating the Journal for the Academic Study of Magic; both of these ventures have been of real importance in bringing academics interested in the study of western esotericism, witchcraft, and other allied areas together in constructive dialogue.

Although I never met Dave face to face - living in different parts of Europe prevented that - we corresponded on many issues over the past couple of years, and I'd like to think that we became friends of a sort. He was a genuinely nice, down-to-earth, and funny guy. He was also famously straight talking, always willing to give a forthright answer or honest opinion, which was probably part of what made him so endearing. He kindly gave an interview with me here at Albion Calling last December, in which he reflected on his life and work; reading it back now, I feel that there is an added poignancy to many of his comments. I can just hope that the interview acts as something of a tribute to him, and plays a small part in encouraging a new readership for Dave's work, which is something that it certainly deserves.

Having been diagnosed with a terminal illness earlier this summer, Dave decided to live out his last days amongst the beautiful scenery of New Zealand, where he passed away yesterday on his own terms. Dave, I hope you are finally at peace. Thank you for everything that you achieved and gave to the world. You are going to be missed.

Monday, 12 August 2013

Upcoming documentary: “A Very British Witchcraft" (Saturday 17 August, More4)

For all my readers in the UK, you might be interested to learn that More4 will be screening their brand new documentary, "A Very British Witchcraft", on Saturday 17 August at 9pm. According to their website, the documentary covers "The story of Wicca, from Dorset nudist colonies to witches casting spells to ward off Hitler, tabloid hysteria and appearances on Panorama", and features contributions from Professor Ronald Hutton of the University of Bristol, who is one of the world's foremost expert in the early history of Pagan Witchcraft. Sounds like its worth a watch!

Friday, 9 August 2013

“In Defense of Pagan Studies: A Response to Davidsen's Critique"

The latest issue of The Pomegranate: The International Journal of Pagan Studies has recently been uploaded to the Equinox Publishing website, with hard copies currently at the printers. As those familiar with my work will be aware, this is a peer-reviewed journal that I have regularly contributed to over the past few years, being the only academic journal devoted entirely to the field of Pagan studies, in which I partially specialise.

Once again, I have contributed to this particular issue, both with two book reviews and an opinion piece, in which I discuss the purpose and direction that the field of Pagan studies seems to be taking. Titled "In Defense of Pagan Studies: A Response to Davidsen's Critique", my essay is in part a critical analysis of a 2012 paper published by Danish religious studies scholar Markus Altena Davidsen of Leiden University. In his "What is Wrong with Pagan Studies?", published in the Method and Theory in the Study of Religion journal, he provided a scathing indictment of the state of Pagan studies, written from the perspective of an outsider to that field. Many of his arguments are useful and valid, and I would certainly encourage interested persons to read his work before my response.

Nevertheless, I felt that some of his points were unfair or misleading, and I noticed a plethora of factual mistakes in his paper which required addressing, lest those with little knowledge of contemporary Paganism(s) and Pagan studies assumed that they were correct. At the same time I wished to extend some of Davidsen's arguments to provide a wider critique of Pagan studies, centring particularly on the problems of terminology which plague the field. A PDF of my paper can be downloaded here for £14.00 (sorry it's so expensive; not my decision!).

However, my two book reviews, also published in this issue of The Pomegranate, are available as free PDFs, if you wish to download them. The first is a review of Witchfather, Philip Heselton's excellent two-part biography of the "Father of Wicca" Gerald Gardner, while the second looks at Michael G. Lloyd's ground-breaking biography of Eddie Buczynski, Bull of Heaven. Both books are really good reads, and I would certainly recommend that those interested in the history of modern Witchcraft and Paganism give them both a read. It is hoped that they serve to inspire and influence future scholars in producing further biographies of the key figures in Craft history.

Tuesday, 6 August 2013

An Interview with Brian Hoggard

After what seems too lengthy an absence here at Albion Calling, I'm back with another interview in my ongoing series of discussions with academics and independent researchers devoted to the study of religion, ritual, and magic. This week we have Worcester-based archaeologist Brian Hoggard here, one of the foremost researchers into the archaeology of British folk magic, a fascinating subject to which he devoted a chapter in Owen Davies and Willem de Blecourt's fantastic anthology Beyond the Witch Trials: Witchcraft and Magic in Enlightenment Europe (Oxford University Press, 2004). Hoggard's preparing his latest project, Apotropaios, a study of folk magical charms and spells concealed within the home, which looks set to be a major contribution to the field. We talk about his work, and the role that archaeology has to play in the study of folk magical praxes.

EDW: So Brian, thanks for talking to Albion Calling today; the first question I'd like to ask you is how you first decided to pursue archaeology, and what was the academic trajectory that led you to the position that you are at now ?

Mr Hoggard with a megalith
Image provided by Mr Hoggard
During my late teens and early twenties I developed a strong interest in local places and wanted to understand the stories behind them. This led to me studying local history, archaeology, architecture and folklore. It also led to me returning to college and then going on to University where I originally intended to study archaeology. I'd started writing a book about Bredon Hill* by then however so needed to remain in the area and at that time the best local choice was to do a history degree. Luckily for me the history of witchcraft was part of my module choices and I focused on that in my dissertation too.  When I came across Ralph Merrifield's book it seemed that my background subjects were perfectly suited to doing an in-depth study of ritual objects from the early modern period so I began studying at that point (back in 1999).

*[EDW: For our international readers, Bredon Hill is in Worcestershire, part of England's West Midlands.]

EDW: You're one of very few archaeologists to have actually devoted your attentions to the fascinating role of folk magic in the British archaeological record. Off the top of my head, I can only think of the late Ralph Merrifield, author of The Archaeology of Ritual and Magic (1987), who really devoted a lot of time to the subject. What made you decide to follow this particular research interest, and have you found it easy pursuing such an under-researched topic ? Do you feel that there have been naysayers within the archaeological community who have been sceptical of your decision to pursue what could be thought of by some as a fringe interest ?

I've always had an interest in alternative beliefs and practices so stumbling across Merrifield's book was a joy. Having just studied witchcraft from the history perspective and discovered that none of the historians in that field had included any archaeology at all it was clear to me that more work was needed.  One of the advantages of studying an area like this is that every new bit of information feels like an exciting discovery because it's more than likely not been recorded or written about before.  There is some work out there on this topic but it tends to be very find-specific rather than looking at the broader subject area.  I haven't come across many naysayers but the nature of these finds is that they are incidental within building archaeology so often appear as footnotes rather than the subject of papers in themselves.

Apotropaic items discovered behind a fireplace in Pershore, Worcestershire.
Image provided by Mr Hoggard.
EDW: Of course the subject of folk magic in Early Modern and Modern Britain has been looked at by quite a few historians, including the likes of Keith Thomas and Owen Davies; have you taken an interdisciplinary approach to the subject by uniting the historical sources with the surviving material culture, or is your approach very much archaeology-centred ? Furthermore, do the two sources match up, or are you finding things in the archaeology that the historians just aren't picking up on ?

The aim is to be as interdisciplinary as is needed to properly understand the finds.  Most of the objects were intentionally concealed and appear to have been deliberately not mentioned in contemporary documents so as not to draw attention to them so often the only evidence is the material evidence. Certainly a good number of practices were written about which helps provide a context for these other, more private, practices.  Occasionally a find will tie up with some local history, for example, a witch-bottle from Essex was accurately dated and this clearly tied-in with the terminal ill-health of a former occupant of the house.  No mention was ever made of any witch-bottles but the evidence was there in the hearth and the history of the occupants was well known.

Bellarmine witch bottle discovered beneath the hearth of a cottage in Felmersham, Bedfordshire. 
It contained hair, pins and urine. Image provided by Brian Hoggard.
EDW: A large part of my research has been looking at contemporary Witchcraft(s) existing here in Britain over the last century; many (though not all) of these are new religious movements with little to do with folk magic and more traditional popular attitudes toward witches, but it would be fascinating to hear what your experiences have been with those who continue to practice older styles of magical praxes in Britain ? Have you encountered much contemporary folklore on the issue ?

I regularly receive correspondence from contemporary witches and pagans.  Some are Wiccan but many are independent and claim to be descended from and trained by other witches.  Pretty much all of them know about witch-bottles but have their own variations of the recipe.  Written charms are the only other find-type that they tend to speak to me about and, again, modern versions are very different to the ones recovered from old buildings.  One or two witches have claimed to have a book which has been handed down through their family which contain all kinds of magic, herbalism and astrology - thus far none have been prepared to share but they do have a strong code of conduct about that.

EDW: You have of course also appeared on television on numerous occasions; could you tell us a bit about this, and your own views on the role that such documentaries have for the wider appreciation and understanding of archaeology and heritage, and in particular the history of folk magic ?

I think documentaries can be a really good way of outlining the topic for people and giving them the chance to see the objects. It's rare that they go into any great depth on the subject (which is a shame!) but maybe one day a proper documentary series will be created which explores the objects and the theories about them  more fully.  Certainly they've been very useful for me in drawing attention to my research and encouraging people to report objects to me through my website and definitely they've had a role in spreading awareness amongst heritage professionals too.

A dead dried cat found in the thatch of a cottage in Eckington, Worcestershire.
Image provided by Brian Hoggard.
EDW: Your new project, which you are currently in the process of raising funds for, is called Apotropaios, and its a book containing all the research that you have undertaken over the years into the archaeological evidence for items concealed within houses for folk magical purposes. That of course includes things like shoes, dead cats, and the famed witch bottles, many of which can be seen at the Museum of Witchcraft in Boscastle, Cornwall, as well as in the Museum of London stores. I've also had the pleasure of seeing some of these items at Blackden, the Late Mediaeval home of novelist Alan Garner up in Cheshire. This is a really fascinating topic and your book looks set to be a really important milestone in the study of these items. Could you tell us more about this, and your decision to self-publish ?

Apotropaios is the Greek root of the word apotropaic which means 'evil-averting'.  I've been studying the topic since 1999 but with one thing and another I've never had the time to get around to publishing it.  I've decided that my book needs to be really well illustrated and that self-publishing is the best way to achieve that.  I am also really keen to have substantial appendices in the back of the book which will be useful for future researchers of the topic.  I'm just not sure I'd be able to find a publisher who would be prepared to illustrate it to that degree or include all the data.  The plan is to publish something that will be a genuine resource for future scholars and to finally get all my thoughts out into the public domain.

EDW: And lastly, I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on what you see as the future for the archaeology of ritual and magic here in Britain ?

There's still a lot of scope for study here.  Although I have done the largest survey on the house protection topic thus far I am well aware that it is nowhere near exhaustive.  Detailed regional studies (perhaps on a county basis) are needed and indeed more individual case studies.  There is so much of this archaeology out there and it needs mapping to demonstrate the extent and duration of these beliefs and practices.  It's an exciting area with huge room for more study.

Thank you Brian, and good luck with Apotropaios! For those who would like to donate to Brian's project, and enable him to publish the book to the desired standard, you can visit his Kickstarter link hereBut be quick, as the fundraising campaign ends on 16 August 2013; that's just ten days away!

Saturday, 3 August 2013

Upcoming conference: “Popular Antiquities: Folklore and Archaeology" (12-13 October 2013)

I have had the honour of being invited to co-organise this year's "Popular Antiquities: Folklore and Archaeology" conference, alongside UCL PhD candidate Tina Paphitis and the Folklore Society's Dr. Caroline Oates. Scheduled to take place at the UCL Institute of Archaeology in Central London on Saturday 12 and Sunday 13 October, it looks to be a fascinating event, and I'd welcome any of my readers to grab a ticket and come along for the weekend. Unfortunately entry isn't free, but we are offering concessions for those who are unwaged or students, as well as those who are already members of The Folklore Society. We of course will be providing lunch, refreshments, and wine!

This will be the third year that this event has been held, and the second which has seen it run as a collaboration between UCL and The Folklore Society. I myself presented a paper at the very first "Popular Antiquities" conference, back in October 2011, on the subject of "Devil's Stones and Midnight Rites: Megaliths, Folklore and Contemporary Witchcraft", in which I got to unite my interest in archaeology, folklore, and new magico-religious movements. I've since produced an academic paper on the basis of that conference presentation, which is set to appear in the prestigious Folklore journal at some point in the near future, something that I'm naturally rather excited about!

We have some great speakers lines up, including some big names in the field of folkloristics like Jeremy Harte, who'll be rounding off Saturday with a discussion of "Moral Megaliths". If this conference look's like the sort of thing that would interest you, grab your ticket here. I hope to see many of you there...