Today’s interview is with Dr Amy Hale, an anthropologist and folklorist based in Atlanta, Georgia who has published on a range of topics since the early 2000s, including modern Celtic identity in Cornwall, esoteric intersections with right-wing politics, and the overlap between esotericism and art. Her recent book, Ithell Colquhoun: Genius of the Fern Loved Gully (Strange Attractor, 2020), represents the most in-depth study of the eponymous English artist and occultist who made Cornwall her home and is a must-read for anyone interested in that area. She is also the co-chair of the Contemporary Pagan Studies Section of the American Academy of Religion (AAR) and sits on the editorial board of both Correspondences: Journal for the Study of Esotericism and the Black Mirror Research Network. We talk about Colquhoun, the growing body of research on occultism and the arts, and the place of the “independent scholar” in academia.
[EDW] Your PhD thesis in
Folklore and Mythology, which you completed at the University of California,
Los Angeles in 1998, was devoted to modern Celtic identity in Cornwall, a
county (and, in some views, a nation) in the southwest of Britain. What was it
about Cornwall that attracted your interest and brought you all the way over
the Atlantic to conduct research?
[AH] People
are surprised to discover that my interest in Cornwall is not the result of
having any Cornish ancestry. I don’t have any that I know of. My interest started out as a series of
intellectual and theoretical questions which eventually transitioned into an
emotional connection. I had been interested in modern Celtic identities since
high school. A lot of people interested in Celtic culture and history are drawn
to the romance of the mythology and imagined pagan (and Pagan) pasts, but that
was never my thing except for very briefly as a teen. I wanted to explore the
core of what makes people so obsessed with the idea of “The Celts”, although I
wasn’t sure what that meant or where my journey might take me.
I majored in Anthropology
as an undergraduate and for my BA thesis I conducted independent research in
Galway, Ireland looking at how Irish mythology was informing contemporary Irish
identities on the eve of the coalescing of the European Union (this was
1989-90). It was during this time that I
realized that the stories so often told about the continuity and spread of
Celtic peoples since the Bronze Age were fiction. The reality of the idea of the Celts is
fragmented, modern and in many ways the result of a mix of colonialism and
efforts at cultural taxonomies that frequently served political interests.
In 1994 I did exploratory
fieldwork toward my PhD in Cornwall, staying with Cornish language speakers and
cultural activists. Cornwall was a site of interest for me because there is
still so much (mainly external) dissention about Cornwall’s Celtic identity and
the legitimacy of Cornish ethnicity. I
was utterly blown away and very moved by the complexity of the cultural and
political situation there. Likely because I’m an American I get a very
different picture of the Cornish/English cultural dynamic that is invisible to
many English people in particular. I
ended up moving over in 1995 and stayed until 2001, finishing my PhD in 1998
and eventually working as Lecturer in Contemporary Celtic Studies for the
Institute of Cornish Studies at the University of Exeter.
My interest continues to
be in the political and economic circumstances under which Celtic identities
coalesce, change, and develop. I still see Celtic cultures through the lens of
the dynamics of colonialism and economic and cultural marginalization, and that
is the context which informs my research. In my view Cornwall is still the most
interesting place to explore the dynamic terrains of modern Celtic culture. It is never boring, and I don’t think I will
ever not have a connection with Cornwall and the Cornish people.
[EDW] You have also been
one of the comparatively few scholars to have published research on modern
Druidry, having an article on the subject in the Cornish Studies journal. Was
Druidry part of the main theme of your thesis or a side-project that spun out
of it?
[AH] Druidry
has never been a primary subject of interest for me, but in the study of the
development of modern Celtic identities you can’t escape Druids, as Ronald
Hutton’s work so clearly shows. It’s really unavoidable. Druids are the blank
slate upon which all sorts of Celtic fantasies can be projected, whether it’s
the idea of an ancient pre-Christian priesthood of a nature-based religion, the
politicized symbol of the shared cultural substrate of an imagined once unified
Britain, or the missing link between a nativist, homegrown British Paganism and
Christianity. Modern Druidic
organizations, both spiritual and cultural, (by which I mean the Gorseddau
of Wales, Cornwall and Brittany) have become important points of focus and networking
for modern Celtic identities. This can
take the form of promoting the use of Celtic language in the case of the Gorseddau,
or the way in which many spiritual Druids focus on environmentalism, which has
been widely believed to be a “Celtic” value. Even though these organizations
differ widely in their aims, we can still compare them and see how people
variously understand the idea of a Celtic cultural legacy.
[EDW] During the 2000s, you
were involved in the Journal for the Academic Study of Magic (JASM), which had been
co-founded by Alison Butler and Dave Evans [interviewed here back in 2012] and which was one of the first
peer-reviewed journals to focus on esotericism and related topics. You
contributed to the second volume and then co-edited the fifth (and final)
edition of the journal; how did you get involved in this project? What was it
like working on British esotericism when there really was little institutional
framework for supporting such research topics?
[AH] In
many ways I think my work with JASM helped to realign my career more
toward the study of esotericism and away from a professional alignment with Celtic
Studies, which in the US is a rather limiting and restrictive field mostly
focused on medieval literature and philology.
I became involved when the late Dave Evans, who was a close friend at
the time, was having trouble managing the editorship. I offered to help, and Susan Johnston Graf
and I took over the editing duties for the final edition. JASM was a very ambitious project, working
to include scholarship on modern practice as well as including an empirical and
historical approach, which at the time characterized much of the European scholarship
on the esoteric. I am sad that it
couldn’t be sustained and I think there could be a lot of promise in another journal
project of this kind, although Correspondences comes close. [The founding editors of Correspondences were interviewed here in 2013]. JASM also generated a lively research
network for a while and the online discussion used to be very vibrant when
there were fewer opportunities for that sort of interaction. Although it still technically exists as a
mailing list, it has become greatly diminished.
I would really love to
see more institutional support in the UK for solid academic work on esotericism
and Pagan topics. It’s not that it isn’t out there, but there is no journal or organization
that reflects British approaches in the way that I feel JASM did. I have always believed that British
scholarship is quite creative and innovative and, in many ways, pushes
boundaries that American programs just don’t. Some of the approaches you find
in British universities, Cultural Studies for example, would lend themselves
well to the study of esotericism. A
solid British institutional presence would genuinely enrich the field. I know
this likely sounds odd coming from an American scholar, but I still feel that
the UK in many ways remains my scholarly and professional home base.
[EDW] Where does your
interest in modern Paganism and occultism come from? Was this an interest you had
had since childhood or something that emerged while you were engaged in your
PhD research?
[AH] It
was absolutely an interest from my youth but I had never anticipated that it
would become such a central part of my wider research profile. But as I noted with Druidry, you can’t really
look closely at modern Celtic identities and not end up dealing with Paganism
and the occult.
Sure, I was a weird kid
and interested in witchcraft at a very young age. I had friends, but like many
young people who are drawn to esoteric topics, I was certainly an eccentric
child and I spent much of my free time seeking out wooded areas on my bike,
having imaginative adventures. I discovered the occult in high school when I
started leveraging my eccentricities to more productive social ends. I was a walking cliché, with wild blonde
Stevie Nicks hair, listening to a ridiculous amount of Led Zeppelin. My mom
bought me [Aleister] Crowley’s Magick in Theory and Practice when I was 16. I don’t
think she knew what she was buying, to be honest but she wanted to support my
interests. I was raised in a very confirmed and explicitly atheist household,
but my parents were also tolerant, inquisitive, and smart. They provided a
critical framework for me around religion and spirituality that I retain to
this day.
This was around the same
time that I started becoming obsessed with all things romantically Celtic, and
I got a hold of some esoteric Arthuriana from the 19th and early 20th century which was republished in the mid-1980s. Those became a huge focus of
interest at the time. In fact, I still have a huge soft spot for the all the
weird contexts of esoteric Arthuriana and would love to do a major project on
it one day. I didn’t focus on Paganism academically in my undergraduate
curriculum to any degree, but it so deeply intersects with some of the ways
that historical ideas of the Celts have informed modern Cornwall that Paganism
became an integral part of my PhD research. As time went on, Paganism and the
occult became more strongly featured in my work in general. Now I’m the
Co-Chair of the Contemporary Pagan Studies section of the American Academy of
Religion, but I suspect that is less because of my research history and more
because I am a sucker with some slick administrative talents.
[EDW] Your new book, Ithell
Colquhoun: Genius of the Fern Loved Gully (Strange Attractor, 2020)
explores the Surrealist artist and occultist who spent much of her life in
Cornwall. Can you tell us a little about who she was and how you came to be
fascinated by her story?
[AH] Ithell
Colquhoun (1906-1988) was a Surrealist artist and occultist, and I firmly
believe she was one of the most prolific and engaged woman occult practitioners
of the 20th century. She was
a visual artist whose archives contain over 5000 paintings and drawings. She
was a novelist, essayist and poet who wrote early Earth Mysteries style
travelogues on sacred sites in Cornwall and Ireland in the 1950s. She moved to Cornwall part time in the 1940s,
full time in 1959, and Cornwall was a central part of her own engagement with her
own romantic Celtic Spirituality.
Unusually, though, she also had a great deal of respect for Cornish
culture and the Cornish language, and while she was not really a Cornish
activist she advocated for some level of autonomy for Cornwall and the
preservation of Cornish culture.
Studying Colquhoun was a natural for me as her work and interests were a perfect intersection of my own. She is emblematic of the spiritual seeker who comes to Cornwall for spiritual reasons, but she also had a nascent understanding of the political sensibilities that drive ethnic Celtic political movements. A lot of this was likely inspired in her by the work of W. B. Yeats who shared these conceptual traits in his life and work. The complexity of her work is utterly boggling and she still keeps me busy.
[EDW] There seems to have
been a growth in interest in the connections between art and occultism over the
past decade, a topic that you have explored in several of your publications.
What do you see as the importance of this area of research and what potential
does it offer?
[AH] I
think the strong focus on art that we have seen in scholarship about the occult
in the past decade or so has helped to provide an accessible introduction to
scholarship about esotericism. Art is
tangible. It provides a way to demonstrate how esoteric and occult principles
are used in a way that people can see and maybe even have a personal response
to. In a way literature provides similar points of discussion. What is changing
is that in the past decade we are seeing a movement away from a discussion of
esoteric symbolism in the arts to the role of practice and worldview of the
artist. Scholars are no longer fixated
on tracing the freaky social networks and “weird” interests of the artist,
which was a dominant approach in the past.
We are now looking at how their art becomes a vehicle for spiritual practice,
and how esoteric ideas shape and inform a wider body of work. Art becomes a way
to discuss practice without jumping straight into ritual, which frankly some
scholars still find a challenge to talk about. It’s been a safe gateway subject
and as such a very popular topic. Also, let’s be honest, the occult has
produced a lot of art and literature! Not all of it is great, but some
certainly is.
I do have some concern,
though, that the topic is in danger of being played out. There have been a lot
of books and conferences devoted to it and I think that while there will always
be productive inquiry in this area, as a field I’d like to see us branch out a
bit. I’d love to see more focus on topics like place and space, aesthetic and
style, intersections with science and medicine and yes, ritual. Having said that, I am still finding
interesting and productive angles in my work with contemporary artists
especially in terms of performance, space and reception, which feature in some
upcoming publications.
[EDW] Another of the
topics that you have published on is the intersection of the modern Pagan and
Earth Mysteries milieus with right-wing politics, especially in forms that have
been influenced by Traditionalism. How did you come to pursue this line of
enquiry and what has been the response from within the Pagan and esoteric
communities?
[AH] Again,
this focus emerged from the double headed beast that is the study of
contemporary Celtic identities. A huge core of my work is about how people
construct and perform their identities in various contexts, and this led me
early on in my graduate career into a deep dive into the relationship between
folklore and nationalism, which as many people know, isn’t the prettiest of
tales. Nativist spiritualities ride the ethnonationalism line pretty tightly,
so the right-wing element has always been a historical feature of them. Ithell
Colquhoun was a Traditionalist, as was W.B. Yeats, and these two were hardly
alone in their understanding and embrace of ethnicized spiritual identity. However, Traditionalism as a discrete and
historical philosophical movement is still not particularly well known. I suggest Mark Sedgwick’s Against the
Modern World: Traditionalism and the Secret Intellectual History of the
Twentieth Century for a good introduction.
During my early research
into Colquhoun, I noticed similar right-wing, nativist tendencies in both the
writings of John Michell and in a lot of the rhetoric around the Archangel
Michael in British New Age and Earth Mysteries culture and I wrote articles on
both those topics. A decade ago, a lot of people thought I was making a
mountain out of a molehill, and some people got genuinely upset with my
research into John Michell and the way he has been claimed and refashioned by
the radical right. I lost friends over that one. But the political landscape
has changed so much since then, that people are now very hungry to understand
what the relationship between Paganism, occultism and the radical right is, and
how it got that way. The seeds have been there all along, but because a lot of
Pagans, especially in the US, see themselves as progressive they are deeply
unsettled by right-wing applications of their values. In fact, many of these
values are just as legitimately emblematic of conservative values, such as
environmental preservation or a love of folk culture. While I know the nature
of my research interests in nativist- inspired spiritualities will always have
me encountering the radical right to some degree, it’s a topic that I need to
take a break from every now and then. Working with contemporary artists has
proved to be a restorative balm for the soul because the political research is
pretty dark.
[EDW] You operate as an
independent scholar and have run classes helping PhD students consider options
other than professional academia. What do you see as the role of the
independent scholar in research, especially when it comes to the study of
modern Paganism and occultism?
[AH] Permit
me to jump on my soapbox a minute about the phrase “independent scholar”. I’m
still not really comfortable with the term.
In academic circles it generally
means someone is non-affiliated with an academic institution, but not having an
academic affiliation comes with its own problems when operating in academic
settings. It carries a stigma. We all know it, and no one likes to talk about
it. People quietly wonder what is wrong with you. Independent scholars are
extremely under supported. I can’t apply for major grants. I can’t be a research lead. I struggle for
access to research libraries and academic publications. For many people conferences are outside their
reach. Some colleagues won’t consider you for collaboration. For people seeking
academic jobs it’s almost impossible to stay competitive.
I taught
for 15 years, and when I became a higher ed consultant I had to drop all my
affiliations as a condition of the job. Then I retired from that job to focus
on my writing and now I’m truly an “independent scholar” because I’m not
anything else, but I’m not sure this is the best label for everyone. I believe strongly that we should be
encouraging people to pursue other careers outside academia while still being
part of scholarly conversations and production if they so choose, and people
should be supported in this choice. If
those non-academic careers remain invisible to the scholarly community because people
are labelled as “independent scholars” it doesn’t help to support or legitimize
other career paths, which is something we all need to be doing. Not everyone
wants to be part of the professoriate or work in a university.
I think it would be great
if our academically employed colleagues would help create better conditions for
non-affiliated scholars to feel valued, and support greater access to research
collections and professional libraries.
It would also be great if more institutions would allow the
non-affiliated to apply for grants! In
small and marginal fields like Pagan Studies, Celtic Studies or the study of
esotericism, there may well be even more scholars without an academic home who
would benefit from collegiality and support. While I would like
to say that independent scholars can have a role of providing critique or
innovation because they are not constrained by the needs of academic
production, I think for many this is not the case because they don’t have the
luxury to work outside such a rigidly defined system or to take chances with
their work.
Jumping down off the
soapbox, though, those of us who are genuinely comfortable as scholars not
working within academic institutions do have enormous potential to become
public scholars, take on creative projects, and be innovative in the research
questions we take on. I want people to read my work! I can write about what I
like for whatever publishers I choose and my work is more creative than it has
ever been. I personally am very happy
with where I am at this stage in my career, but I also admit I’m very privileged.
[EDW] Have you got any
projects on the horizon that we should be keeping an eye out for?
[AH] Absolutely! I am quite thrilled about a collection coming
out with Palgrave that I edited, Essays on Women in Western Esotericism:
Beyond Seeresses and Sea Priestesses. No publication date yet, but likely
late 2021, early 2022. I have a piece on the occult performance art of Barry
William Hale coming out in a summer edition of the journal Correspondences,
which I’m pretty excited about. I’m also working on an edition of Ithell
Colquhoun’s magical essays, and returning to a big work on Cornwall. There’s a
lot going on and I’m pretty excited about it.
[EDW] Dr Hale, thank you for taking part in this interview; I look forward to reading your future endeavours!
No comments:
Post a Comment